The Charging Of Fort Wagner
"..lest I should indirectly give a new impulse to war. The only regiment
I ever looked upon during the war was the 54th Massachusetts on its departure
for the South. I can never forget the scene as Colonel Shaw rode at the head
of his men. The very flower of grace and chivalry, he seemed to me beautiful
and awful, as an angel of God come down to lead the host of freedom to victory."
-John Greenleaf Whittier
On July 18, 1863, the 54th Massachusetts infantry, a Union regiment comprised
of black soldiers and commanded by Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, led an attack
on Fort Wagner, a Confederate stockade blocking the entrance to Charleston,
Virginia. To some, this was considered a tremendous honor to the black soldiers
who risked their lives that night. Others felt that it was an excuse for racist
commanding officers to sacrifice the lives of black soldiers in order to save
those of whites. In an attempt to answer this question, three author's points
of view will be examined-Peter Burchard, Zak Mettger and Luis Emilio. These
three authors virtually agree on almost every factual aspect pertaining to the
history of this regiment except for the question: why was the 54th was sent
to lead the charge on Fort Wagner?
On September 15, 1862, Robert Gould Shaw, who, at that time, was a captain
of a detachment of troops in McClennan's army, arrived at Antietam Creek, in
Sharpsburg, Maryland. Two days later, Shaw was part of the bloodiest battle
in the Civil War. Shaw's unit was lucky and only lost 5 men. Shaw, himself,
only received a neck wound inflicted by a gun shot from out of range. Though
this battle was an important victory for the North, Shaw's life was affected
more than he could have imagined.
Having a record of solid victory, Lincoln saw it fit to use his power as commander
in chief of the United States Army to pass the Emancipation Proclamation, an
order to free the slaves in the rebelling states as a war measure. Now, runaway
slaves would be enlisted in the army and dubbed as contraband. Five months later,
in February of 1863, Shaw's father received a letter from the governor of Massachusetts,
John Andrews, requesting that his son command the 54th Massachusetts Infantry,
a unit to be entirely made up of black troops. When he first heard this news,
Shaw refused the offer, but after reconsideration and a word with his commanding
officer, he accepted. The next month, Shaw arrived at the Readville barracks
where the troops were to be recruited, and where he spent the next two months
training the newly enlisted troops for battle. On May 28, the Massachusetts
54th Infantry marched through the streets of Boston where they were greeted
by scores of people cheering for them. Five days later, they traveled by boat
to Georgia, where the regiment teamed up with a unit of contraband soldiers
under the command of General James Montgomery. The 54th's first call to action
was considered a shameful day for the regiment. It accompanied Montgomery's
forces on what was supposed to be an expedition to forage for necessary military
supplies. When the two regiments came upon the town of Darien, Georgia, Montgomery
ordered his troops to plunder the town and take everything they could carry.
As it turned out, he was illegally shipping all of the plundered goods as personal
luggage back to the North where they would be sold for tremendous profit. The
town was defenseless and there were no Confederate troops near the isolated
area, but Montgomery ordered his troops to open fire on the buildings and destroy
the town. When Montgomery ordered Shaw to have his men set torches and fire
the town, Shaw refused. It wasn't until Montgomery threatened to have Shaw court-martialed
and take away his troops, that Shaw obeyed this order.
After this incident, Shaw began to write the governor of Massachusetts asking
to have his troops reassigned to an area where they would be able to join other
soldiers in the field of battle, as opposed to being relegated to degrading
labor such as burying the dead. On July 8, Shaw's letters were answered, and
he was ordered to have his troops pack blankets, their necessary war materials,
and a day's worth of rations. They were going to South Carolina, in the midst
of the war where they would be based on James Island. Seven days later, the
regiment entered their first real battle. Here, they defeated a group of Confederate
troops, and at the same time, saved the lives of many men in the 10th Connecticut
Infantry by diverting Confederate fire. The very next day, the 54th traveled
to Morris Island where they were assigned to lead the charge on Fort Wagner,
the primary defense of Charleston. At 6:30 p.m. on July 18, 1863, without sleeping
or eating for the previous two days, the 54th made their daring charge. Although
they fought with tremendous inspiration and bravery, they were defeated and
suffered heavily, losing almost half of their force. Among the dead lay Colonel
Shaw, who was buried with his own troops. Approximately a month after the charge,
Congress passed an order declaring that black and white troops were equal and
that black troops were to be put into action as soon as possible.
Peter Burchard, author of "One Gallant Charge", praises the regiment
to a higher level than any of the other authors. His factual portrayal of Robert
Gould Shaw and the 54th Massachusetts infantry's history is subjective and makes
a strong argument that the Union army did, in fact, have respect for the men
of the 54th. His secondary argument is the belief that the regiment was not
sent to lead the charge on Fort Wagner in order to be sacrificed for the white
soldiers that would follow. Though this idea is not dealt with directly in the
text of his book, in his personal note at the end, Burchard addresses the issue.
Burchard begins by recounting Shaw's life and the history of the Civil War
to the time of the enlistment of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry. Shaw is referred
to as a hero by the men he commands and is credited with being one of the chief
factors contributing to the valor, bravery, and skill of the 54th. Burchard
recalls many instances of Shaw's outstanding bravery and leadership; the most
powerful being when Shaw volunteers to carry the national flag should the flag
bearer fall. Pointing to the man with the national flag, Strong asked, "If
this man should fall, who will lift the flag and carry on?" Shaw was standing
close to Strong. He took a cigar from between his teeth. "I will,"
he said.1
Most of Burchard's writing that deals with battle, emphasizes the bravery of
Shaw's regiment rather than reciting military statistics. In his portrayal of
the 54th's first battle on James Island, Burchard recounts seven instances of
bravery enacted by its individuals. For example, he describes one act whereby
an outnumbered company of the regiment held their position and continually drew
the fire of charging Confederate soldiers in an effort to save the men of the
10th Connecticut Regiment, who were cornered in a dangerous position with nowhere
to run.2
In his personal note at the end of the book, Burchard discusses his own feelings
and expresses what he feels are the important topics dealing with the history
of the 54th Massachusetts. He focuses on the fact that the commanding officers,
in planning the attack on Fort Wagner, did not choose "Negro" troops
over white troops to lead the attack because of beliefs that "Negro"
troops were expendable. "There is no evidence that the Negroes of the Fifty-Fourth
were chosen to lead the attack on Fort Wagner because they were thought of as
black cannon fodder."3. Burchard's final argument associates the regiments
bravery and actions during the charging of Fort Wagner with Congress' order
to declare "Negro" soldiers equal to whites. He quotes the order in
its references to the regiment and asserts that the men of the 54th contributed
to the "justice which would now be sought for all United States Negroes
under arms."4
Zak Mettger, author of "Till Victory Is Won", wrote about the 54th
with more subjectivity than any of the other authors. The main emphasis of his
book is the idea that the African American soldier in the Union Army was treated
unjustly due to the color of his skin. He focuses on the differences between
the tasks of white and black soldiers and tries to prove that in the field of
battle, black soldiers fought with more skill and bravery than their white counterparts.
The first and foremost difference between black and white soldiers described
in Mettger's writing was the difference in pay. He illustrates the frustration
of the enlisted black man caused by the fact that his white counterpart would
sometimes earn as much as twice or three times as much money per month..5 Mettger
describes the 54th's protests about the lower wage. When they were finally paid,
after a five month delay, the men of the 54th demonstrated their dissatisfaction
by even then, refusing to accept anything short of the proper wage. When John
Andrews, announced that the State Legislature had voted to pay the black troops
three dollars a month extra, a bonus that would make the white and black troops
receive equal pay, a number of soldiers in the 54th were angered. These soldiers
felt as if the governor had "advertised them to the world as holding out
for money and not for principle-that we sink our manhood in consideration for
a few more dollars...".6 Mettger explains that the black men were not upset
about the fact that they had less money, but they were upset because they were
not being treated equally.
In his description of the 54th regiment, Mettger focused on the charge at
Fort Wagner, where it earned its place in American history. He gives a detailed
description of the battle itself and places a lot of emphasis on the 54th's
rigorous trip from James Island, a journey that Mettger holds responsible for
the regiment's tremendous fatigue. Although Mettger credits the charge of Fort
Wagner as an honor for the black soldiers, he claims that is was in no way intended
to be one.7 He claims that the officers involved with planning of the attack,
selected the black troops to lead the charge because of racist opinions and
the fact that black troops were considered to be expendable. "In deciding
the battle strategy, the General in charge, Truman Seymour, had told other officers:
"I guess we will let Strong lead and put those d-----d niggers from Massachusetts
in the advance; we may as well get rid of them, one time as another."8
The final point of view comes from Luis E. Emilio, a company leader in Shaw's
infantry. Having been the leader of a group of these soldiers, he gives the
most gripping and insightful account of the history of the 54th in the his writing,
"A Brave Black Regiment". Emilio goes into detail about the feelings
of the soldiers in the regiment. He describes the high morale of the men and
their ability to relax even after a day of intense training or degrading work.
His explanation for this is the idea that their long hours of slavery must have
taught them how to relax their mind quickly. This is not good reasoning, however.
It leads one to question the validity of Emilio's writing, as the 54th Massachusetts
infantry was composed mostly of free blacks born in the North, not freed slaves.
Emilio delivers the longest and most informative description of the siege of
Fort Wagner. He blames the failure of the siege on the lethargy of the white
troops that were supposed to follow the 54th and "poor generalship"
on the part of Truman Seymour.9. He says that no more men than the amount in
single regiment of the Union Army occupied an area of the fort at the same time.
Moreover, these were men of all different regiments who did not have any organization.
This, combined with the fact that they did not know the base nearly as well
as the Confederates, put them in a dangerous position. Since they were unable
to attack under the heavy fire of their ensconced opposition, the Union Army
was forced to retreat.
The three authors all agree that the 54th Infantry was, indeed, a brave regiment,
but each of them drew this conclusion from different pieces of evidence. Having
been in battle with the regiment, Emilio is able to describe the terror the
men were faced with, and even goes so far as to give examples of the fears the
men had before the siege. He recalls that right before the men were to charge
the fort, they were holding each other's hands in order to comfort each other.10.
Emilio describes the charge with great detail and commends the bravery of the
soldiers when they continued to advance through the sand dunes toward the fort
even after suffering tremendous casualties. He recalls that once inside the
fort, (the regiment was only in a remote section of the stockade for a short
period of time) the men of the 54th displayed great courage by facing off with
a larger, better armed, and better protected Confederate Army. This stand-off
was short lived, however, and the regiment was forced to retreat because of,
what Emilio claims, a lack of reinforcements for which he blames the slowness
of the white units. Burchard refers to Emilio's description of the battle in
his discussion of the siege of Fort Wagner, but uses the battle on James Island
to give the most examples of the regiment's bravery.
Mettger does not use battles to describe the bravery of the fifty-fourth. Instead,
he says that the regiment was brave just in signing up for the army. He indicates
that they knew that they would be treated unjustly but enrolled anyway, and
thus, their action showed their courage and desire to fight. The views of Mettger
and Burchard contradict both in fact and in opinion on the question of why the
54th was sent to lead the charge on Fort Wagner.
While Burchard claims that there is no evidence that the commanding officers
were influenced by the fact the 54th regiment was composed of black soldiers,
soldiers that could be sacrificed for whites, Mettger claims the exact opposite.
He argues that the black troops were sent to fight because they were considered
expendable and claims Truman Seymour specifically said he might as well "get
rid of" the African American troops. If true, that would certainly defend
Mettger's contention.
Emilio's writing agrees with Burchard's and disagrees with Mettger's. Emilio
states that General Strong had asked Shaw if the 54th would want the honor of
leading the charge on Fort Wagner. However, Emilio has the least credibility
due to his erroneous reference to the men in his regiment as being former slaves.
Therefore, Emilio's argument about why the 54th was sent to lead the attack
becomes less compelling in the controversy. The contradiction on the validity
of the Seymour's quote can also lead one to the conclusion that the three authors
have different ideas on the respect the Union army had for the black soldiers.
Burchard and Emilio share the opinion that the black troops earned the respect
of the white officers after their victory over the Confederates at James Island.
This idea, combined with their belief that the officers planning the siege of
Wagner had great respect for Shaw, would make their argument question the validity
Truman Seymour's alleged quote. Mettger argues that the Union officers would
use the black soldiers for most tiring and degrading work, while giving them
the least respect. Therefore, it is not surprising that he would believe that
Truman Seymour would make such a statement dealing with "getting rid of"
the black troops.
All of the historians agree that the black troops were treated unjustly. Therefore,
it can be concluded that the Union army was still treating them unjustly when
they sent the 54th to lead the attack on Fort Wagner. Some may argue that the
54th's bravery on James Island convinced the leading officers that they were,
in fact, more than "black cannon fodder." Yet, the question still
remains unanswered as to whether one act of bravery can convince men, who have
considered African Americans to be an inferior race, to have respect for an
entire people.
Bibliography:
Burchard, Peter. One Gallant Charge. St. Martins Press,
1965.
Emilio, Luis F. A Brave Black Regiment. Bantam Domain 1992.
Mc Pherson, James M. Marching Toward Freedom. 1991.
Mettger, Zak. Till Victory Is Won: Black Soldiers in the Civil
War. Laing Communications Inc., 1994
Footnotes:
1 Peter Burcard, One Gallant Charge, St. Martin's Press 1965, p. 136
2 Ibid., p.123
3 Ibid., Author's note p. 1
4 Ibid., Authors note p. 3
5 Zak Mettger, Till Victory Is Won, Black Soldiers in the Civil War, Laing
Communications Inc., 1994, p. 48
6 Ibid., p. 50
7 Ibid., p. 64
8 Ibid., p. 64
9 Luis F. Emilio, A Brave Black Regiment, Bantam Domain, 1992, p. 92
10 Ibid., p. 85
